Carbon 14--Friend or Foe?
There are literally
hundreds of methods of dating used by the scientific community to
determine the ages of things. One of the radiometric methods used is
carbon 14, and for some reason carbon 14 seems to be a lightning rod
for creationist attacks. Most of these attacks are totally erroneous.
Carbon 14 is actually a great friend of the Bible and poses no threat
to anyone's belief system. What we would like to attempt to do in this
article is to talk about the errors that have been made by both
creationists and atheists on this subject and try to explain what the
facts are and why carbon 14 is totally in agreement and is compatible
with the Bible.
Carbon 14 Is a Natural Process That Can Be Observed
Radiometric dating is a very simple process which is easy
to understand. Suppose you are babysitting with a room full of active
two-year-olds. If there is one door to the room and the door is wide
open, children will escape. The rate at which they escape will start
out being pretty high, because the more kids there are to watch, the
less likely it is that you can control all of them. If there were 100
children in the room and one door that is open, children would
gradually escape until there were only 50 children left in the room
(assuming you did not go out of the room to catch the escapees.) The
time it took for half the kids to escape is called the half-life. What
happens is that if it took 20 minutes for 50 of the 100 kids to escape,
in another 20 minutes 25 of the remaining 50 would escape. The half
life is always the same, with half of the total number escaping every
time. Suppose the room had two doors instead of one. The kids would
escape at a much higher rate, would they not? The half life would be
shorter because the escape system is more active. It might take only 10
minutes for half the 100 kids to escape.
The above example is factual when one examines
radioactive material. If you have a thyroid test or treatment with
radioactive iodine, when the iodine is first produced and is highly
radiative, its decay rate is very high. It gradually lowers at a
predictable and observable rate, because its half-life is a matter of
hours. Some radioactive materials take days, some months, and some
years. All of these have been studied and are used in different ways in
industry and medicine. Some materials like uranium decay very slowly.
Their rate is so slow that it would take more than a human lifetime for
them to decay half of their mass. In the case of uranium 238 the rate
is so slow it would take billions of years for half of the mass to
decay. Scientists assume that uranium decays the way iodine or other
short life isotopes do, and this is used to approximate the ages of
things that contain uranium. In the case of carbon 14 the decay rate is
in the 5000 year range, so a 10-gram mass of carbon 14 would have a
mass of 5 grams after 5000 years.
Carbon 14 is useful in science because it is so available. The air
has minute quantities of carbon 14 in it. As plants take in carbon
dioxide, they accumulate carbon 14 in their stems and leaves. Animals
that eat the plants take in the carbon 14 and it
accumulates in their bones and tissues. As long as a plant or animal is
alive, it is constantly taking in carbon 14 and the ratio of carbon 14
to other isotopes of carbon and other chemicals in all living things is
constant. When a plant or animal dies, they no longer take in carbon
14. Since carbon 14 decays radioactively, the amount of carbon 14 in
the dead plant or animal decreases, with half of its mass being lost
every 5000 years. By measuring the ratio of carbon 14 to other
chemicals in the plant or animal remains, a good estimate of the age
can be determined. Carbon 14 has been verified as accurate
in
many ways. Dated documents from thousands of years ago have been dated
by carbon 14, and the age turns out to be the same as the date on the
document. Carbon 14 has been matched against tree rings
(dendrochronology) and the results have been the same. It is a
wonderful tool of archeology and physical anthropology, and has all
kinds of uses.
Carbon 14 Is a Great Friend of the Bible
When skeptics of the
Bible have attempted to prove that the Bible is a faked document of
recent age, carbon 14 has always proved them wrong. One of the favorite
themes of Bible critics was that the Bible was written thousands of
years later than was claimed by those who supported the Bible, and that
most of it was written to fit what had already happened. As more and
more documents were found and dated by carbon 14, it became obvious
that the claims of skeptics were not valid. The Dead Sea Scrolls which
contained the entire messianic prophesy of Isaiah 53 was proven to have
been written some 500 years before Christ's birth, so skeptic claims
that it was written after the death of Christ were put to rest. Various
events and places of the New Testament and Old Testament have been
validated by carbon 14. Carbon 14 has universally supported the Bible,
and is a great friend of scripture.
Carbon 14 Is Only Used for Young Things and Is Never Used on Dinosaur Remains
The amount of carbon 14 in a body or a plant is microscopic. When
the material goes through one half life, the amount of material that is
left is half of what you started with. In another 5000 years, you have
half of that amount, and for almost anything you measure that mass is
too small for instruments to detect. When scientists measure dinosaur
bones, they find no carbon 14 at all. The amount of carbon 14 that was
there when the animal was alive has decayed to such an extent that it
is all gone. If we go back to our analogy of the
two-year-olds in the room, eventually they will all escape--one way or
another. When a creationist criticizes carbon 14's measurement of the
age of a dinosaur, most young people know they do not understand what
carbon 14 is about. Carbon 14 is wonderful for things a few thousand
years old, and may even be useful for ages approaching 10,000 years,
but it is never used for things believed to be millions of years old.
The very fact that most fossils contain no carbon 14 raises questions
about the earth being 6000 years old, but the main point is that carbon
14 is not a part of that discussion, because its half-life is too short
to be used for such measurements.
Carbon 14 Is Based on Assumptions, Some of Which are Wrong
Let us go back to our starting analogy again. Suppose you have the room with some kids escaping out the door, and some devious person slips 10 extra two-year-olds in the room that you did not know about. What would that do to your half-life? Suppose someone came by, and without you knowing it they took 20 kids out of the room. What would that do? Suppose someone provided an elevator that took kids out without you being aware of it. Would your half life figure be accurate? All radiometric methods of measurement assume that nothing has changed the decay rate of the isotope. All radiometric methods assume that no material was added to the sample or taken away from the sample during the decay.
In the case of carbon 14, we know that is not true. Measurements of
the carbon 14 in bristle cone pines have shown that the amount of
carbon 14 in the atmosphere has not been constant, and that about 2000
years ago there were some natural processes that
changed that concentration. The amount of change would not produce huge
differences in measurements, but the effect is there. There have been
some studies that suggest that an electrical field of high
concentration can alter decay rates. These findings probably have a
greater impact on longer-lived isotopes like uranium or
potassium-argon, but they are an issue that has to be considered in
calculations. The older the sample is, the less likely it is that our
estimate of age is going to be accurate. Any method of dating has
assumptions associated with it, but in the case of carbon 14 because of
the many ways of checking and compensating for environmental factors,
the effects that the assumptions would have on the final result are
probably minimal.
Science and Faith Are Friends
The bottom line of this discussion is that there will never be and cannot be a contradiction between scientific fact and what the Bible says. Radiometric decay is a fact, and we can use it to verify many things the word of God says. If we think we have a contradiction between what the Bible says and fact, we need to do some investigating. Either we do not understand the Bible correctly, or we have misunderstood the fact. Both are authored by God and they cannot conflict. In the case of carbon 14, we have a human religious tradition that is not valid biblical understanding, and we have a scientific method which has some assumptions that have not been fully understood. Young people need to understand that both science and faith are growing, complementary, symbiotic, supportive entities that can challenge, encourage, and enlighten us all. The Bible has a little to say about "science, falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20) and a lot to say about man-made creeds and false teachers who do their teachings because they have a selfish agenda (see 2 Peter 2, Acts 20). We need to get by all of that and show our children that they can intelligently believe in God and in everything the Bible says.
Back to Contents Does God Exist?, NovDec05.